Chamber Comparison
Eco-Dive 32vsHenshaw 1662
Eco-Dive
32
1.3
ATA
—
Starting
—
Warranty
Henshaw
1662
1.4
ATA
$7K
Starting
3yr
Warranty
The Bottom Line
The Henshaw 1662 has clear advantages in max pressure and clinical credibility. However, both chambers sit in the Entry Wellness tier, so consider your specific requirements before deciding.
Key Differences
Eco-Dive
1.3 ATA
Henshaw
1.4 ATA
Higher pressure enables more clinical protocols. The Henshaw 1662 reaches 1.4 ATA, which covers most wellness applications.
Eco-Dive
2/10
Henshaw
4/10
This score reflects published studies, certifications, and clinical adoption. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence backing the manufacturer's claims.
Who Should Buy Which?
Best for
Henshaw 1662
Users seeking higher pressure in soft-shell format, wellness enthusiasts
View full details →Full Specification Comparison
| Specification | Eco-Dive 32 | Henshaw 1662 |
|---|---|---|
| Chamber Type | Soft-Shell | Soft-Shell |
| Performance Tier | Entry Wellness | Entry Wellness |
| Max Pressure | 1.3 ATA | 1.4 ATA★ |
| Oxygen Delivery | ambient-air | ambient-air |
| O₂ Concentration | — | 21% (ambient); optional O2 concentrator available |
| Capacity | 1-person | 1-person |
| Weight | — | 30.9 lbs |
| Interior Dimensions | — | Large single-person design |
| Portability | portable | semi-portable |
| FDA Cleared | No | No |
| CE Marked | No | Yes★ |
| Made In | United States | United Kingdom |
| Price | Contact distributor | £5,500 - £7,500 (~$7,000 - $9,500) |
| Warranty | — | 3 years |
| Clinical Score | 2/10 | 4/10★ |
| Brand Established | — | 2008 |
| Climate Control | No | No |
| Communication System | No | No |
| Emergency Features | — | Safety release valves, dual zipper, interior pressure controls |
Eco-Dive 32 — Standout Features
Henshaw 1662 — Standout Features
Interested in either chamber?
Request quotes from both manufacturers and compare real pricing.
Request Quotes →